code cleanup done

[gautam-divyanshu]

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Issue Number:

Fixes #2589

Did you add tests for your changes?

Snapshots/Videos:

If relevant, did you update the documentation?

Summary

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

Other information

Have you read the contributing guide?

Summary by CodeRabbit

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Removed documentation update jobs from the GitHub Actions workflow to streamline processes.
  • Retained jobs for codebase checks, testing, and application builds.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the GitHub Actions workflow in .github/workflows/push.yml by removing the Update-Documentation and Documentation-to-talawa-docs jobs. These jobs were responsible for updating and exporting documentation when changes were pushed to the automated-docs branch. The remaining jobs, such as Flutter-Codebase-Check, Flutter-Testing, Android-Build-and-Release, and iOS-Build, remain unchanged, focusing on code quality checks, testing, and application builds.

Changes

File	Change Summary
.github/workflows/push.yml	Removed Update-Documentation and Documentation-to-talawa-docs jobs and associated steps.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Remove the code which updates the docs because workflow is shifted to talawa_docs repo (#2589)	✅

Possibly related PRs

• mdx file added #2583: The changes in this PR involve documentation processing, which is indirectly related to the main PR's removal of documentation jobs in the workflow. Both PRs focus on aspects of documentation management within the project.

Suggested reviewers

• noman2002

Poem

In the garden where code does bloom,
We’ve tidied up, cleared out some gloom.
No more docs to fuss and fret,
Just builds and tests, our best duet!
Hops of joy, let’s celebrate,
A streamlined path, oh, isn’t it great? 🐇✨

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 637b2d9 and 6066fc4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/push.yml (0 hunks)

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)

• .github/workflows/push.yml

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[github-actions]

Our Pull Request Approval Process

We have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team.

Testing Your Code

Please make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if either of these two conditions occur:

1. The overall code coverage drops below the target threshold of the repository
2. Any file in the pull request has code coverage levels below the repository threshold

The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

1. comments in this PR or
2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

Other

🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.46%. Comparing base (5c8a4b6) to head (6066fc4).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #2590      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    96.44%   96.46%   +0.02%     
===========================================
  Files          180      180              
  Lines         9233     9233              
===========================================
+ Hits          8905     8907       +2     
+ Misses         328      326       -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[noman2002]

Please create an issue for this and link it to this PR.

[gautam-divyanshu]

@noman2002 you can merge now, i forget to link the issue

[tasneemkoushar]

@gautam-divyanshu can you rebase