Added try-catch #2592
Added try-catch #2592
Conversation
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessWe have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team. Testing Your CodePlease make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if either of these two conditions occur:
The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
Other🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise. |
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request focus on enhancing error handling in the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
lib/utils/time_conversion.dart (5)
22-33: Approved: Error handling improvement forsplitDateTimeUTCThe addition of error handling and the updated documentation improve the function's robustness and clarity. The try-catch block effectively prevents exceptions from propagating and provides useful debug information.
Consider using a more specific error message prefix, such as "Error parsing UTC date time in splitDateTimeUTC:" for easier log filtering and debugging.
43-54: Approved: Error handling improvement forsplitDateTimeLocalThe addition of error handling and the updated documentation improve the function's robustness and clarity, similar to the changes in
splitDateTimeUTC.For consistency with the suggestion for
splitDateTimeUTC, consider updating the error message prefix to "Error parsing local date time in splitDateTimeLocal:" for easier log filtering and debugging.
64-72: Approved: Error handling improvement forconvertUTCToLocalThe addition of error handling and the updated documentation improve the function's robustness and clarity. The approach is consistent with the previous functions while appropriately returning an empty string instead of an empty map.
For consistency with the previous suggestions, consider updating the error message prefix to "Error converting UTC to local in convertUTCToLocal:" for easier log filtering and debugging.
82-90: Approved: Error handling improvement forconvertLocalToUTCThe addition of error handling and the updated documentation improve the function's robustness and clarity. The approach is consistent with the
convertUTCToLocalfunction.For consistency with the previous suggestions, consider updating the error message prefix to "Error converting local to UTC in convertLocalToUTC:" for easier log filtering and debugging.
Line range hint
22-90: Overall improvement in error handling, but tests are missingThe changes consistently improve error handling across all four time conversion functions (
splitDateTimeUTC,splitDateTimeLocal,convertUTCToLocal, andconvertLocalToUTC). The addition of try-catch blocks and updated documentation enhance the robustness and clarity of these utilities.However, there's an important aspect missing from this PR:
No tests have been added or updated to verify the new error handling behavior. To ensure the reliability of these changes, please add unit tests that cover:
- Valid input scenarios
- Invalid input scenarios (to test the new error handling)
- Edge cases (e.g., empty strings, malformed date strings)
This will help maintain the integrity of the time conversion utilities and prevent potential regressions in the future.
Would you like assistance in generating these unit tests?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- lib/utils/time_conversion.dart (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
lib/utils/time_conversion.dart (1)
Line range hint
1-90: Clarification needed: PR objectives vs. actual changesThe PR objectives mention implementing "Timezone Middleware with Apollo" (issue #2558), but the changes in this file focus on adding error handling to existing time conversion functions. While these improvements are valuable, they don't seem to directly address the middleware implementation described in the linked issue.
Could you please clarify:
- How do these changes relate to the timezone middleware implementation?
- Are there additional changes planned or required to fully implement the timezone middleware?
- Should the PR description be updated to better reflect the current changes?
This clarification will help ensure that the PR accurately addresses the intended objectives and that no critical components are missing from the implementation.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #2592 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 96.47% 96.48%
========================================
Files 180 180
Lines 9227 9233 +6
========================================
+ Hits 8902 8908 +6
Misses 325 325 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
test/widget_tests/after_auth_screens/events/time_conversion_test.dart (1)
98-109: LGTM: Comprehensive error handling test for traverseAndConvertDatesThis test case effectively verifies the error handling behavior of
traverseAndConvertDatesfor various invalid inputs in a nested object structure. It aligns well with the PR's objective of improving error handling in time conversion functions.Consider splitting this test into multiple smaller, more focused test cases for better readability and easier debugging. For example:
- Test for invalid 'createdAt'
- Test for invalid 'startDate'
- Test for invalid 'startTime'
This approach would make it easier to identify which specific conversion is failing if the test breaks in the future.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- test/widget_tests/after_auth_screens/events/time_conversion_test.dart (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (5)
test/widget_tests/after_auth_screens/events/time_conversion_test.dart (5)
27-30: LGTM: Good addition of error handling testThis test case effectively verifies the error handling behavior of
splitDateTimeUTCfor invalid input. It aligns well with the PR's objective of improving error handling in time conversion functions.
38-41: LGTM: Consistent error handling test for local timeThis test case for
splitDateTimeLocalis consistent with the previous one for UTC time. It effectively verifies the error handling for invalid input, supporting the PR's goal of improving robustness in time conversion functions.
53-56: LGTM: Proper error handling test for UTC to local conversionThis test case for
convertUTCToLocalmaintains consistency with the previous error handling tests. It correctly verifies that an empty string is returned for invalid input, which aligns with the PR's focus on improving error handling in time conversion functions.
68-71: LGTM: Consistent error handling test for local to UTC conversionThis test case for
convertLocalToUTCmaintains the pattern established in the previous tests. It effectively verifies that an empty string is returned for invalid input, which is in line with the PR's objective of enhancing error handling in time conversion functions.
Line range hint
27-109: Overall assessment: Excellent addition of error handling testsThe new test cases added in this file significantly enhance the robustness of the time conversion utility tests. They cover various error handling scenarios for different time conversion functions, ensuring that invalid inputs are handled gracefully. This aligns perfectly with the PR's objective of improving error handling in time conversion functions.
Key improvements:
- Consistent error handling tests for UTC and local time conversions.
- Verification of empty return values for invalid inputs.
- Comprehensive test for nested object structures in
traverseAndConvertDates.These additions will greatly contribute to maintaining the stability and reliability of the application when dealing with time conversions. Great job on improving the test coverage!
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Try catch for conversions
Issue Number:
Fixes #2558
Did you add tests for your changes?
NA
Snapshots/Videos:
NA
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
NA
Summary
This PR adds extra checks for conversions.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Other information
NA
Have you read the contributing guide?
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Tests