Unit test chat service #2693
Unit test chat service #2693
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request focuses on enhancing the test coverage for the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
Other🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
test/service_tests/chat_service_test.dart (3)
24-32: Enhance error handling and finalize logging.
- Consider removing or handling potential mutation errors more explicitly. Currently, if
gqlAuthMutationfails, the code doesn’t handle that scenario.- The
print(messages.first.id)at line 71 seems like a debugging artifact. Consider removing or converting it to a test expectation or logging statement if it's truly necessary.Also applies to: 41-60, 63-76
Line range hint
78-130: Potential improvement to reduce reliance on real backend structure.Tests currently rely on the exact schema of
directChatsByUserID. Consider adopting a domain-specific mock or factory pattern for your test data, so that changes to the backend schema do not break tests unnecessarily.
Line range hint
132-156: Check for increased coverage and handling of multiple messages.Similar to the previous test, you’re collecting messages in a list and completing a
Completer. Consider writing a test for multiple messages or lack thereof to ensure the logic ingetDirectChatMessagesByChatIdholds under all scenarios.Also applies to: 165-185
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
test/service_tests/chat_service_test.dart(7 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
test/service_tests/chat_service_test.dart (4)
4-11: Imports look good.The new imports for
dart:async,ChatListTileDataModel, andChatMessageare appropriate for the added tests.
187-190: Stream type checks are meaningful and well-integrated.Verifying the returned stream types helps ensure that the streams output the correct model objects. This is a sound addition to improve reliability and developer confidence.
Also applies to: 192-194
Line range hint
78-103: Verify data structure correctness.The test effectively checks the structure of the returned chat data, including user details and chat IDs. Ensure that the real endpoint returns data in the same structure (e.g., confirm the shape of
'directChatsByUserID').Also applies to: 112-130
✅ Verification successful
Data structure for
directChatsByUserIDis consistent across the codebaseThe verification shows that the data structure is consistent across all relevant files:
- GraphQL Query (
lib/utils/chat_queries.dartand docs): Defines the structure with_id,usersarray containing_id,firstName, and- Service Implementation (
lib/services/chat_service.dart): Processes the data as a List and maps it toChatListTileDataModel- Test Files: Both
chat_queries_test.dartandchat_service_test.dartmaintain the same structure in their test dataThe test's mock data correctly mirrors the structure used in the actual implementation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that 'directChatsByUserID' is consistently structured across the codebase. rg -A 5 'directChatsByUserID'Length of output: 2895
55-60: Caution with stream subscription.While the logic to wait for the first emitted item using
Completeris valid, it might be beneficial to handle edge cases, such as when no message arrives or if multiple messages arrive beforecompleter.complete()is called.Also applies to: 67-70
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #2693 +/- ##
====================================================
+ Coverage 96.22% 96.24% +0.02%
====================================================
Files 189 189
Lines 9994 9994
====================================================
+ Hits 9617 9619 +2
+ Misses 377 375 -2 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
noman2002
merged commit bb59156
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Unit testing for chat service.
Issue Number:
Fixes #2617
Did you add tests for your changes?
yes
Snapshots/Videos:
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Have you read the contributing guide?
yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
ChatServicechatListStreamandchatMessagesStream