Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 26, 2019. It is now read-only.

ProposerSelection to support multiple IBFT implementations #307

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 25, 2018

Conversation

rain-on
Copy link
Contributor

@rain-on rain-on commented Nov 25, 2018

The ProposerSelection logic has been reworked such that it now accepts
a BlockInterface, through which IBFT parameters can be accessed
directly from the block header, without requiring literal hashing etc.

This has required the VoteBlockInterface to be renamed to
BlockInterface.

The ProposerSelection logic has been reworked such that it now accepts
a BlockInterface, through which IBFT parameters can be accessed
directly from the block header, without requiring literal hashing etc.

This has required the VoteBlockInterface to be renamed to
BlockInterface.
@rain-on rain-on added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 25, 2018
@rain-on rain-on requested review from ajsutton and jframe November 25, 2018 10:35
Copy link
Contributor

@ajsutton ajsutton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@rain-on rain-on merged commit 085321b into PegaSysEng:master Nov 25, 2018
rain-on added a commit to rain-on/pantheon that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2018
…g#307)

The ProposerSelection logic has been reworked such that it now accepts
a BlockInterface, through which IBFT parameters can be accessed
directly from the block header, without requiring literal hashing etc.

This has required the VoteBlockInterface to be renamed to
BlockInterface.
@rain-on rain-on deleted the prop_selc_rework branch January 16, 2019 21:35
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants