Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: fix verify flow for packages config #173

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 18, 2023
Merged

Conversation

wuhuizuo
Copy link
Contributor

Signed-off-by: wuhuizuo [email protected]

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot requested review from jayl1e and purelind December 18, 2023 08:05
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Dec 18, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from wuhuizuo. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Dec 18, 2023

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

Review of "ci: fix verify flow for packages config"

Summary

This pull request makes changes to the workflow related to verifying packages config. Specifically, it adds some steps to install tools and modifies some scripts. It also adds a new dockerfile.

Potential Problems

  1. There are no tests, which makes it difficult to know if the changes work as intended.
  2. The commit message and description do not provide enough context to understand the changes being made. More information on why these changes are necessary would be helpful.

Suggestions

  1. Add tests to ensure that the changes work as intended.
  2. Improve the commit message and description to provide more context. This could include information on what issues the changes address, and what the impact of the changes are.
  3. Consider splitting the changes into smaller, more focused pull requests. This would make it easier to review and understand the changes being made.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the size/L label Dec 18, 2023
@wuhuizuo wuhuizuo merged commit d54536d into main Dec 18, 2023
11 of 13 checks passed
@wuhuizuo wuhuizuo deleted the fix/add-ng-monitoring-builder branch December 18, 2023 08:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant