Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update ghcr.io/pingcap-qe/cd/utils/release docker tag to v20240325-60-gb6f8928 #353

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 9, 2024

Conversation

wuhuizuo
Copy link
Contributor

@wuhuizuo wuhuizuo commented Jul 9, 2024

User description

  • bump to oras v1.2.0

Signed-off-by: wuhuizuo [email protected]


PR Type

Enhancement


Description

  • Updated the Docker image tag for ghcr.io/pingcap-qe/cd/utils/release to v20240325-60-gb6f8928 in packages/packages.yaml.tmpl.
  • This update includes a bump to oras version 1.2.0.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
packages.yaml.tmpl
Update Docker image tag for release utilities                       

packages/packages.yaml.tmpl

  • Updated the image tag for ghcr.io/pingcap-qe/cd/utils/release from
    v20240325-14-gdd4a4cf to v20240325-60-gb6f8928.
  • +3/-3     

    💡 PR-Agent usage:
    Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

    … v20240325-60-gb6f8928
    
    - bump to oras v1.2.0
    
    Signed-off-by: wuhuizuo <[email protected]>
    @ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot requested a review from purelind July 9, 2024 12:08
    Copy link

    ti-chi-bot bot commented Jul 9, 2024

    I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

    Based on the pull request, the following key changes were made:

    • The docker tag for ghcr.io/pingcap-qe/cd/utils/release was updated to v20240325-60-gb6f8928
    • The oras version was bumped to v1.2.0

    There don't seem to be any potential problems with this pull request. However, it is always a good idea to check if all the dependent services are compatible with the new version of the image.

    As a suggestion, it would be helpful to add more details in the pull request description to give more context about why these changes were made. It could also be helpful to mention any testing that was done before opening the pull request.

    Overall, this pull request seems fine and can be merged as long as all the dependent services are compatible with the new image version.

    @qodo-merge-pro qodo-merge-pro bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 9, 2024
    @ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the size/XS label Jul 9, 2024
    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    @wuhuizuo wuhuizuo left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    /approve

    Copy link
    Contributor

    qodo-merge-pro bot commented Jul 9, 2024

    PR-Agent was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your git user with your CodiumAI identity here.

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪
    🧪 No relevant tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    ⚡ No key issues to review

    Copy link

    ti-chi-bot bot commented Jul 9, 2024

    [APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

    This pull-request has been approved by: wuhuizuo

    The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

    The pull request process is described here

    Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

    Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
    Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

    @ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the approved label Jul 9, 2024
    Copy link
    Contributor

    qodo-merge-pro bot commented Jul 9, 2024

    PR-Agent was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your git user with your CodiumAI identity here.

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Maintainability
    Use a variable for the Docker image tag to simplify future updates

    Consider using a variable for the Docker image tag to ensure consistency and ease
    future updates. This approach avoids the need to manually update the tag in multiple
    places.

    packages/packages.yaml.tmpl [19]

    -image: ghcr.io/pingcap-qe/cd/utils/release:v20240325-60-gb6f8928
    +image: ghcr.io/pingcap-qe/cd/utils/release:{{ .DockerImageTag }}
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9

    Why: Using a variable for the Docker image tag improves maintainability by centralizing the version information, making future updates easier and reducing the risk of inconsistencies.

    9
    Best practice
    Ensure Docker image version consistency across configurations

    Ensure that the Docker image version is consistent across all configurations to
    prevent potential issues with version mismatches.

    packages/packages.yaml.tmpl [49]

    -image: ghcr.io/pingcap-qe/cd/utils/release:v20240325-60-gb6f8928
    +image: ghcr.io/pingcap-qe/cd/utils/release:{{ .ConsistentDockerImageVersion }}
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: Ensuring consistency of the Docker image version across all configurations is a best practice that prevents potential issues related to version mismatches.

    8
    Security
    Validate the Docker image tag before production deployment

    Validate the new Docker image tag to ensure it is accessible and correct before
    deploying it in production environments.

    packages/packages.yaml.tmpl [1425]

    -image: ghcr.io/pingcap-qe/cd/utils/release:v20240325-60-gb6f8928
    +image: ghcr.io/pingcap-qe/cd/utils/release:{{ .ValidatedDockerImageTag }}
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: Validating the Docker image tag before deploying to production enhances security by ensuring the image is correct and accessible, although the suggestion could be more specific about the validation process.

    7
    Reliability
    Implement a fallback mechanism for Docker image retrieval

    Add a fallback mechanism for Docker image retrieval to handle cases where the
    specified tag is unavailable.

    packages/packages.yaml.tmpl [19]

    -image: ghcr.io/pingcap-qe/cd/utils/release:v20240325-60-gb6f8928
    +image: ghcr.io/pingcap-qe/cd/utils/release:{{ .FallbackDockerImageTag }}
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6

    Why: Adding a fallback mechanism for Docker image retrieval can improve reliability by handling cases where the specified tag is unavailable, though it might add complexity to the configuration.

    6

    @ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot merged commit 458ad0d into main Jul 9, 2024
    1 of 2 checks passed
    @ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot deleted the fix/bump-cd-util-relase-iamge branch July 9, 2024 12:12
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    1 participant