-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Feature Request] CPPF Implementation #280
Comments
Regarding, re-checking PPF, maybe the task could be to simply reproduce the On 27 September 2013 09:54, aichim [email protected] wrote:
|
I think I did that when I originally implemented it, but having a second pair of eyes look at it is never bad :-) |
Ah, I see :) On 27 September 2013 10:03, aichim [email protected] wrote:
|
Hi guys, I've committed a simple implementation of CPPF using normalised HSV values in the feature vector to a local fork here: https://github.com/mszarski/pcl/compare/cppf-impl. Before I issue the pull request, was normalised HSV what you intended for PCL? |
@mszarski , thanks for your quick contribution. It would be really interesting to have a little example application that compares the performance of the two techniques on a couple of RGB-D frames. |
CPPF Feature Implementation per issue #280
Seems like this was solved, closing. |
Ran into this paper today: http://www.cc.gatech.edu/~cchoi/Publications_files/Choi12iros_3d.pdf
It's basically the PPF we have already in the features module with additional color information. It would be a nice starter task for someone that wants to contribute to PCL. In the process, it would also be nice to re-check the correctness of PPF.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: