Format notebooks with Ruff #2199
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Check out this pull request on See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
frankharkins
force-pushed
the
FH/ruff-format
branch
from
cb478ee to
31c3652
Compare
frankharkins
commented
Oct 29, 2024
| @@ -0,0 +1 @@ | |||
| line-length=78 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This seems to be the longest length that doesn't scroll horizontally on the website. I tested by inspect element then adding characters until the box scrolled on Firefox.
|
One or more of the following people are relevant to this code:
|
Eric-Arellano
approved these changes
Oct 29, 2024
Eric-Arellano
approved these changes
Oct 29, 2024
|
Gonna wait to merge this until after #2139 is merged to avoid further disruption. |
Eric-Arellano
approved these changes
Nov 4, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Follow-up to #2197. Draft until that PR is merged, then I'll rebase this.
Also a partial fix for #1806 depending if we want to also lint code examples in MDX.