Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix flakiness in pulse-optimal UnitarySynthesis test (backport #11307) #11309

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 23, 2023

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Nov 23, 2023

This is an automatic backport of pull request #11307 done by Mergify.


Mergify commands and options

More conditions and actions can be found in the documentation.

You can also trigger Mergify actions by commenting on this pull request:

  • @Mergifyio refresh will re-evaluate the rules
  • @Mergifyio rebase will rebase this PR on its base branch
  • @Mergifyio update will merge the base branch into this PR
  • @Mergifyio backport <destination> will backport this PR on <destination> branch

Additionally, on Mergify dashboard you can:

  • look at your merge queues
  • generate the Mergify configuration with the config editor.

Finally, you can contact us on https://mergify.com

The previous iteration of this test asserted that the `sx` count for
non-optimal synthesis was higher than a certain particular value.  This
value did not have any fundamental properties, it was just the value
that happened to be returned for some time.  Recent OpenBLAS support
for x86_64 instructions from the AVX512 SkylakeX set meant that
supporting processors can now return slightly fewer `sx` gates in the
non-optimal path, despite the pulse-optimal synthesis still not being in
use.  This caused flaky CI, when we were allocated an Azure VM that had
access to the new instructions.

(cherry picked from commit c7ecb5f)
@mergify mergify bot requested a review from a team as a code owner November 23, 2023 15:20
@qiskit-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you for opening a new pull request.

Before your PR can be merged it will first need to pass continuous integration tests and be reviewed. Sometimes the review process can be slow, so please be patient.

While you're waiting, please feel free to review other open PRs. While only a subset of people are authorized to approve pull requests for merging, everyone is encouraged to review open pull requests. Doing reviews helps reduce the burden on the core team and helps make the project's code better for everyone.

One or more of the the following people are requested to review this:

  • @Qiskit/terra-core

@github-actions github-actions bot added type: qa Issues and PRs that relate to testing and code quality Changelog: None Do not include in changelog labels Nov 23, 2023
@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 6971589155

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • 14 unchanged lines in 2 files lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.01%) to 86.94%

Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
crates/qasm2/src/parse.rs 6 97.6%
crates/qasm2/src/lex.rs 8 91.16%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 6964675004: -0.01%
Covered Lines: 74196
Relevant Lines: 85342

💛 - Coveralls

@jakelishman jakelishman added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 23, 2023
Merged via the queue into stable/0.45 with commit 5fef2b5 Nov 23, 2023
15 checks passed
@mergify mergify bot deleted the mergify/bp/stable/0.45/pr-11307 branch November 23, 2023 18:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Changelog: None Do not include in changelog type: qa Issues and PRs that relate to testing and code quality
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants