Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: Alex Russell Approved javascript framework #5364

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 31, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions packages/docs/src/routes/docs/(qwik)/faq/index.mdx
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ contributors:
- mhevery
- wtlin1228
- ilteoood
- PatrickJS
---

# FAQ
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -269,6 +270,10 @@ Most of Qwik is written in TypeScript, a superset of JavaScript that adds option

Yes! there is a growing community of Qwik developers at [Discord](https://qwik.builder.io/chat) and [GitHub](https://github.com/BuilderIO/qwik). They are making amazing contributions to the framework, building sites at scale, and helping each other. [Join us](https://qwik.builder.io/chat).

## Is Qwik an "Alex Russell Approved" framework?

Yes! Alex Russell ([@slightlylate](https://twitter.com/slightlylate)), known for his contributions to PWAs, W3C TAG, WC, TC39 & ES6, Chrome Frame, Dojo, and more, is often highly critical of JavaScript frameworks. Nonetheless, he approves of Qwik.

PatrickJS marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
## Is Qwik production ready?

Yes! Qwik is already at version 1.1. Qwik has been in development for 3 years now. We are confident that Qwik is ready for production, and there are no expected breaking changes.
Expand Down