feat(qwikcity/actions): dotnotation field-errors

[tzdesign]

Overview

On very complex nested types, you loose the location or the field the error belongs to.

BREAKING CHANGE:

The fieldErrors type on the action changed from Record<string,string[]>
(simplified) to Record<string,string | string[]> where the key is now dot notation

Closes #5463

More context

@ulic75 added the possibility for complex form with the PR #4634 and we were trying to use it in our cart. As you might imagine, the cart type is very complex and has more than one level. Example action with comparable type here:

export const useAddressFormAction = routeAction$(
  () => {},
  zod$((z) =>
    z.object({
      email: z.string(),
      address: z.object({
        street: z.string(),
        city: z.string(),
        zip: z.string(),
      }),
    })
  )
);

export default component$(() => {
  const addressAction = useAddressFormAction();
  return (
    <Form action={addressAction}>
      <input
        type="email"
        name="email"
        class={{
          error: addressAction.value?.fieldErrors?.email?.length ?? 0 > 0,
        }}
      />
      <br />
      <input
        type="text"
        name="address.street"
        class={{
          error: addressAction.value?.fieldErrors?.['address']?.length ?? 0 > 0,
        }}
      />
      <br />
      <input
        type="text"
        name="address.city"
        class={{
          error: addressAction.value?.fieldErrors?.['address']?.length ?? 0 > 0,
        }}
      />
      <br />
      <input
        type="text"
        name="address.zip"
        class={{
          error: addressAction.value?.fieldErrors?.['address']?.length ?? 0 > 0,
        }}
      />
      <br />

      <button>Send</button>
    </Form>
  );
});

As you can see. You can't determine if address.street is failing exactly, as the errors on address are just an array of strings.

With my approach the errors are the following type:

type FieldErrors = Partial<
    Record<
      | "email"
      | "address.street"
      | "address.city"
      | "address.zip",
      string
    >
  >

With this in mind, the name of the input and the field in fieldErrors will be exactly the same.
And what's impossible now, becomes possible:

<input
        type="email"
        name="email"
        class={{
          error: addressAction.value?.fieldErrors?.email
        }}
      />
      <br />
      <input
        type="text"
        name="address.street"
        class={{
          error: addressAction.value?.fieldErrors?.['address.street'] !== undefined,
        }}
      />
      <br />
      <input
        type="text"
        name="address.city"
        class={{
          error: addressAction.value?.fieldErrors?.['address.city'] !== undefined,
        }}
      />
      <br />
      <input
        type="text"
        name="address.zip"
        class={{
          error: addressAction.value?.fieldErrors?.['address.zip'] !== undefined,
        }}
      />

Arrays

Since @ulic75 also made something like person.0.name possible, I had to change the type for fieldErrors to string | string[]. This means if you have arrays in your validation there are two things which can happen.

The array is missing in the provided data:

fieldErrors will have the property arrayName[] with an array as type.

Example output:

{
   "arrayName[]": ["Required"]
}

The array is NOT missing, but data does not validate:

For example you have addresses like {street: string, zip: number}[] as validation type. You pass address street, but forgot about zip. You will get this:

{
   "addresses[].zip": ["Required"]
}

What is it?

• Feature / enhancement
• Bug
• Docs / tests / types / typos

Checklist:

• My code follows the developer guidelines of this project
• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• Added new tests to cover the fix / functionality

[netlify]

👷 Deploy request for qwik-insights pending review.

Visit the deploys page to approve it

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	9ec0a32

[tzdesign]

@gioboa this is my idea of fixing #5463

Let me know what you think. Added the infos to the docs.
As @mhevery and @wmertens was mention in #5463. Maybe you have an opinion on that?

We are now in production without passing validation and using this flattenZodMap locally in the action body.
Not perfect, but with this pr, we could refactor passing validation again.

Did a draft, as I had issues linking this. Some dirty task for spa_init. Not sure if I am the cause.

[pkg-pr-new]

Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

commit: 9ec0a32

@builder.io/qwik

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@builder.io/qwik@6568

@builder.io/qwik-city

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@builder.io/qwik-city@6568

eslint-plugin-qwik

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/eslint-plugin-qwik@6568

create-qwik

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/create-qwik@6568

---

templates

• default

[tzdesign]

@gioboa I added the array field.

I was reading the code and thought about arrays in general.

My change is helping a lot with deep nested objects, but it's the same kind of unhelpful with complex forms having arrays with objects and arrays.

I guess we could make it even more complex, but I don't think it's necessary for 99% of the people out there.

[gioboa]

Thanks @tzdesign 🚀 for this great piece of code

[gioboa]

I tested the solution and it's working fine.
You added docs and test, what a great job. Thanks @tzdesign