-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fe310: Support compilation with clang #15176
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
With this, you can override this value with a different triple.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This flexibility is luckily not needed for LLVM. Technically,
riscv32-none-elf
is the correct target triplet for 32 bit embedded (bare metal) RISC-V targets. Differently to GCC, the target triplet is just an argument rather than a prefix to the binaries and managed upstream, so unless one manually patches clang to only work with incorrect target triples, nobody will need to change this.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was thinking of the riscv64-none-elf triplet available in the Debian/Ubuntu package manager. On Debian/Ubuntu, that would need picolibc but IIUC, it might be possible to use llvm also with picolibc ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, the libraries are resolved using the triple in
TARGET_ARCH
, which can be distinct fromTARGET_ARCH_LLVM
. The issue is thatriscv64-none-elf
is the correct triple for the 64 bit RISC-V, but we only support 32 bit so far. Ariscv64-none-elf
multilib GCC toolchain would support both 32 and 64 bit flavors, butclang
wants the correct triple.E.g. when the c lib is installed as
riscv-none-embed
, this is a completely invalid target triple. But splitting the target triple used to resolve the GCC toolchain and c library from the target triple passed to LLVM, we overcome the issues.Yes, starting with
clang11
it is possible.clang10
doesn't understand the-specs=
parameter.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the clarifications @maribu. Makes sense to me now.