-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
tests/gcoap_fileserver: add test for PUT #18725
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
benpicco
requested review from
miri64,
smlng,
leandrolanzieri,
aabadie,
MichelRottleuthner,
fjmolinas,
haukepetersen,
PeterKietzmann and
cgundogan
as code owners
October 11, 2022 22:49
github-actions
bot
added
Area: CoAP
Area: Constrained Application Protocol implementations
Area: network
Area: Networking
Area: sys
Area: System
Area: tests
Area: tests and testing framework
labels
Oct 11, 2022
benpicco
added
the
Type: bug
The issue reports a bug / The PR fixes a bug (including spelling errors)
label
Oct 11, 2022
benpicco
added
the
CI: ready for build
If set, CI server will compile all applications for all available boards for the labeled PR
label
Oct 11, 2022
benpicco
force-pushed
the
tests/gcoap_fileserver-put
branch
from
October 11, 2022 22:52
3b344b0
to
245aef3
Compare
Murdock results✔️ PASSED 7e0aeb3 tests/gcoap_fileserver: add test for PUT
ArtifactsThis only reflects a subset of all builds from https://ci-prod.riot-os.org. Please refer to https://ci.riot-os.org for a complete build for now. |
benpicco
force-pushed
the
tests/gcoap_fileserver-put
branch
from
October 12, 2022 08:39
245aef3
to
5c7e8d6
Compare
fabian18
reviewed
Oct 12, 2022
fabian18
reviewed
Oct 12, 2022
benpicco
force-pushed
the
tests/gcoap_fileserver-put
branch
from
October 12, 2022 09:37
5c7e8d6
to
7e0aeb3
Compare
fabian18
approved these changes
Oct 12, 2022
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ACK
Thank you for the quick review! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
Area: CoAP
Area: Constrained Application Protocol implementations
Area: network
Area: Networking
Area: sys
Area: System
Area: tests
Area: tests and testing framework
CI: ready for build
If set, CI server will compile all applications for all available boards for the labeled PR
Type: bug
The issue reports a bug / The PR fixes a bug (including spelling errors)
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Contribution description
This adds a test for blockwise PUT to
tests/gcoap_fileserver
.Doing so uncovered a bug: When a block would be transmitted, but the ACK got lost, the sender would re-transmit the block.
This triggered the
block1.offset != (unsigned)ret
check in the GCoAP fileserver which considered this an error and aborted the transmission.To fix this, simply ignore old blocks and send a
COAP_CODE_CONTINUE
anyway.Testing procedure
CI will run
tests/gcoap_fileserver
.Issues/PRs references