-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test/unittest: cleanup most vera++ complains #18807
Conversation
Murdock results✔️ PASSED c29d2f1 test/unittest: cleanup most vera++ complains
ArtifactsThis only reflects a subset of all builds from https://ci-prod.riot-os.org. Please refer to https://ci.riot-os.org for a complete build for now. |
79cd15e
to
c29d2f1
Compare
Could probably devided up somehow, if more concise test suites are identified. |
Maybe some shorter names by using some abbreviations? |
@kaspar030 seems to be the main author in that directory, there is a co-authorship by @fjmolinas too, though. So probably, INRIA, but in the end, they have to say. PS: Took me a moment to understand what you mean by C-holder... |
@miri64 would you approve to merge this as it is? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@miri64 would you approve to merge this as it is?
Yepp yepp, sorry thought your original comments were asking for advice how to handle.
thank you it was but i also like to get cleanups in fast since they tend to conflict -> need rebase -> need another n murdock run -> merge and handle in another cleanup is much faster |
Contribution description
cleans up most vera++ complains in unitest
what is left:
I tend towards agreeing and so does github
there is a license notice but no c holder
Testing procedure
read and let murdock check
Issues/PRs references
in #18744 i saw some static-test complains for unchanged code the comlainee was vera++ -> i ran that on all unittest and cleaned that up