Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

xtimer: Skip ahead when target time has already passed #7629

Closed

Conversation

jnohlgard
Copy link
Member

Based on top of #7496, #7628
The purpose is to get back on schedule after something has made us miss a deadline. This changes the behaviour of the periodic functions to skip iterations in case the schedule is missed.

@jnohlgard jnohlgard added Discussion: RFC The issue/PR is used as a discussion starting point about the item of the issue/PR Area: timers Area: timer subsystems labels Sep 20, 2017
@jnohlgard jnohlgard added this to the Release 2017.10 milestone Sep 20, 2017
@jnohlgard jnohlgard added the State: waiting for other PR State: The PR requires another PR to be merged first label Sep 20, 2017
@Josar Josar mentioned this pull request Nov 15, 2018
@Josar Josar mentioned this pull request Dec 18, 2018
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Aug 10, 2019

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. If you want me to ignore this issue, please mark it with the "State: don't stale" label. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the State: stale State: The issue / PR has no activity for >185 days label Aug 10, 2019
@stale stale bot closed this Sep 10, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Area: timers Area: timer subsystems Discussion: RFC The issue/PR is used as a discussion starting point about the item of the issue/PR State: stale State: The issue / PR has no activity for >185 days State: waiting for other PR State: The PR requires another PR to be merged first
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants