-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Makefile.include: fix missing target for libraries #8911
Makefile.include: fix missing target for libraries #8911
Conversation
8e3f7ba
to
049d4c2
Compare
I will try a PR to show that murdock fails to detect it. |
This fixes #8910 for me. I'm not familiar enough with the makefiles to review the code here though. |
Even when doing @emmanuelsearch can you test ? |
|
The I added an issue to track this problem of use before define. #8913 |
Fixed the rule because some modules are built by packages makefile. |
please squash! |
Unittests add libraries in 'BASELIBS' which do not have any rules to be built as they are built by 'application.inc.mk', packages and the DIRS variable. So make complains about missing target for the unittests archives. The fix tells these files are generated when building '$(APPLICATION_MODULE).a'. The bug was introduced by RIOT-OS#8844 Fixes RIOT-OS#8910
ad19d71
to
94214cd
Compare
Rebased and squashed message |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ACK.
…nittests Makefile.include: fix missing target for libraries
Unittests add libraries in 'BASELIBS' which do not have any rules to be built as
they are built by 'application.inc.mk' and the DIRS variable.
So make complains about missing target for the unittests archives.
The fix tells these files are generated when building '$(APPLICATION_MODULE).a'.
The bug was introduced by #8844
Fixes #8910