We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hi, this is a feature request por Single.defer(), analog to Observable.defer().
The idiom I've settled for now is
Observable.defer(() -> Observable.just(produceValue())).toSingle()
But I find it very cumbersome and considerably more difficult to read that
Single.defer(() -> Single.just(produceValue()))
Of course, I can be missing something, as I'm just adopting rx.Single in my codebase. :)
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello. There is already a PR for this: #3433.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Sorry, I didn't see it.
El mar., 13 de octubre de 2015 17:56, David Karnok [email protected] escribió:
Hello. There is already a PR for this: #3433 #3433. — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #3441 (comment).
Hello. There is already a PR for this: #3433 #3433.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #3441 (comment).
Sergio Delgado -- Serandel mailto:[email protected]
Quoth the raven, 'Nevermore.'
'Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better.' -- Samuel Beckett
No branches or pull requests
Hi, this is a feature request por Single.defer(), analog to Observable.defer().
The idiom I've settled for now is
But I find it very cumbersome and considerably more difficult to read that
Of course, I can be missing something, as I'm just adopting rx.Single in my codebase. :)
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: