You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We have started collecting functionality related to Async.java, Observable.start, and similar such as in #645 and #622.
These do not directly apply to the goals of rxjava-core in enabling async Observable behavior but are valuable utilities for converting to and from Observable and executing work asynchronously.
Having them in the core however has the following drawbacks:
they increase API surface area, code and byte size
they complicate the mental model by mixing multiple different concepts
they are tied to the java.util.concurrent model
different Java libraries such as Guava and Akka have different models
each JVM language has different concurrency models and libraries
work can be executed asynchronous in many ways such as actors, event-loops or thread pools and rxjava-core is purposefully non-opinionated about the source of concurrency or asynchronocity
For these reasons it is felt that this functionality should be removed and/or not accepted into rxjava-core but instead placed in a contrib module. This is similar to how rxjava-android and rxjava-swing add additional functionality.
We have started collecting functionality related to
Async.java
,Observable.start
, and similar such as in #645 and #622.These do not directly apply to the goals of rxjava-core in enabling async
Observable
behavior but are valuable utilities for converting to and fromObservable
and executing work asynchronously.Having them in the core however has the following drawbacks:
java.util.concurrent
modelFor these reasons it is felt that this functionality should be removed and/or not accepted into rxjava-core but instead placed in a contrib module. This is similar to how
rxjava-android
andrxjava-swing
add additional functionality.https://github.com/Netflix/RxJava/tree/master/rxjava-contrib
/cc @headinthebox and @jhusain
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: