Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

API Design Review #695

Closed
sirinath opened this issue Dec 27, 2013 · 2 comments
Closed

API Design Review #695

sirinath opened this issue Dec 27, 2013 · 2 comments

Comments

@sirinath
Copy link

My thoughts on the API Design Review. Try to be faithful to the MS implementation much as possible where feasible. Any enhancements can also live along side the core implementation.

With other language bindings also coming from MS, it is good that there are consistency among the implementations.

So idiomatic Rx comes before any other implementations. Idiomatic * can core exist along side the standard Rx usage.
@benjchristensen
Copy link
Member

/cc @headinthebox @jhusain @mattpodwysocki

@headinthebox
Copy link
Contributor

Try to be faithful to the MS implementation much as possible where feasible

Of course.

jihoonson pushed a commit to jihoonson/RxJava that referenced this issue Mar 6, 2020
@troley @RobWin
Issue ReactiveX#690: CircuitBreakerConfig java docs update (ReactiveX…
1b0ff4f 
…#695)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@sirinath @benjchristensen @headinthebox