Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

1.x: Do not hide original exception with RxJavaHooks.enableAssemblyTracking() #4213

Conversation

artem-zinnatullin
Copy link
Contributor

Part of #4212.

StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder("Assembly trace:");

for (StackTraceElement e : stes) {
for (StackTraceElement e : in) {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll open separate PR after this one where I'll move filtering stacktrace to onError. This is a hot path while onError isn't, so we can save some CPU time on filtering for errorless chains.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jul 19, 2016

Current coverage is 84.26%

Merging #4213 into 1.x will increase coverage by 0.02%

@@                1.x      #4213   diff @@
==========================================
  Files           265        264     -1   
  Lines         17281      17279     -2   
  Methods           0          0          
  Messages          0          0          
  Branches       2617       2617          
==========================================
+ Hits          14558      14560     +2   
+ Misses         1881       1876     -5   
- Partials        842        843     +1   

Powered by Codecov. Last updated by 65c7070...09fdee3

@akarnokd
Copy link
Member

See #4215 for a less invasive change.

@artem-zinnatullin
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing in favor of #4215.

@artem-zinnatullin artem-zinnatullin deleted the az/1.x/fix-enableAssemblyTracking branch July 20, 2016 20:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants