Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Research expanding chart/graph tooltip to display additional information, such as cloud providers #332

Closed
1 task
cdcabrera opened this issue Jul 2, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed
1 task

Research expanding chart/graph tooltip to display additional information, such as cloud providers #332

cdcabrera opened this issue Jul 2, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
202104 project phase backlog Future work design Design specific enhancement Addition to an existing feature reevaluate Not such a good idea anymore story New feature, or process work to be closed

Comments

@cdcabrera
Copy link
Member

cdcabrera commented Jul 2, 2020 •
edited
Loading

Description

As a designer I need to determine if the chart/graph tooltip should display additional data facet breakout details. This includes adding cloud providers to the chart/graph tooltip.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Research/design displaying additional cloud provider details

Assumptions and Questions

  • Alternative approaches
    • Use a PF searchable/autocomplete dropdown toolbar filter instead
      • Filters require coordination with API team
  • Determine if other details, beyond cloud providers, are available and can also displayed, and when should they be displayed.
    • An option for when the cloud provider details are displayed, since there is limited room within the chart/graph tooltip, could be when the other data facets are hidden through the legend disable/enable.
      Screen Shot 2020-07-02 at 11 41 17 AM
@cdcabrera cdcabrera added story New feature, or process work design Design specific phase 4 backlog Future work labels Jul 2, 2020
@cdcabrera cdcabrera added the enhancement Addition to an existing feature label Jul 17, 2020
@cdcabrera
Copy link
Member Author

cdcabrera commented Jul 17, 2020 •
edited
Loading

As of 20200717 inventory requires completion first

@cdcabrera cdcabrera added phase 5 and removed phase 4 labels Aug 25, 2020
@cdcabrera cdcabrera added the reevaluate Not such a good idea anymore label Dec 4, 2020
@cdcabrera cdcabrera added to be closed 202104 project phase and removed phase 5 labels Feb 2, 2021
@cdcabrera
Copy link
Member Author

This is resolved with billing_provider filtering #894 initiated with the RHOSAK/streams display

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
202104 project phase backlog Future work design Design specific enhancement Addition to an existing feature reevaluate Not such a good idea anymore story New feature, or process work to be closed
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@cdcabrera