-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for user-installable applications #327
Conversation
Issue was I didn't update the remaining samples. Fixing that has shown me that I have other things I need to add and fix. |
Please rebase this onto the latest commit so you get all the required ReSharper inspection checks. |
This may be non-functional at time of commit!
N.B: It is important to note that Remora allows: - Automatic framework responses - Those responses to be made ephemeral Because of this, it brings into question whether there should be validation on the account that a command may be marked as ephemeral, (or worse, may be marked as NON-ephemeral) when the callback hint would indicate that the opposite is true. This behavior- or lack thereof- is technically spawned from developer error, despite being the framework's decision on how to handle commands.
BREAKING-CHANGE: This changes the constructor of the `AllowedContextsAttribute` to take a `params ApplicationCommandContextType[]` instead of an `IReadOnlyList`
This commit is broken, as the Remora.Rest dependency needs to be updated to the latest version to fix one (1) test.
3dd6934
to
9736b65
Compare
Well, messed up my commit dates, but at least it's rebased now. :v |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
InspectCode found more than 20 potential problems in the proposed changes. Check the Files changed tab for more details.
You might want to add the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good - just a few comments, and you should probably run the data scrubber to ensure conformity with the rest of the test data.
No description provided.