Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[pull] master from diygod:master #700

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 16, 2023
Merged

[pull] master from diygod:master #700

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 16, 2023

Conversation

pull[bot]
Copy link

@pull pull bot commented Jul 16, 2023

See Commits and Changes for more details.


Created by pull[bot]

Can you help keep this open source service alive? 💖 Please sponsor : )

Qixingchen and others added 2 commits July 16, 2023 01:11
…in (#12802)

* Update router.js

change followers/followings params

* Update followers.js

add login for followers

* Update followings.js

add login for followings

* Update social-media.md

update bilibili/followers bilibili/followings docs

* Update followers.js

Using camelCase.
Adding Document link.
Cookie check before declaring `uid `.

* Update followings.js

Using camelCase.
Adding Document link.
Cookie check before declaring `uid `.

* Update maintainer.js

* Update README.md

Add docs for bilibili/user/followings & bilibili/user/followers

* Update router.js

Using camelCase

* Update social-media.md

* style: auto format

* Update social-media.md

---------

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Comment on lines +30 to +38
const { data } = await got(strBaseUrl, {
headers: {
platform: 1,
},
searchParams: {
limit: iReqLimit,
offset: iReqOffSet,
},
});

Check failure

Code scanning / ESLint

Disallow `await` inside of loops

Unexpected `await` inside a loop.
@pull pull bot merged commit 041c980 into Rongronggg9:master Jul 16, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants