Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade tslib from 2.0.1 to 2.0.3 #281

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 7, 2020

Conversation

snyk-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@snyk-bot snyk-bot commented Dec 5, 2020

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade tslib from 2.0.1 to 2.0.3.

merge advice
ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 2 versions ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released 2 months ago, on 2020-10-09.
Release notes
Package name: tslib
  • 2.0.3 - 2020-10-09

    Full discussion in the webpack issue

  • 2.0.2 - 2020-10-06

    This release adds support for using tslib in Node using esmodule imports, further context in #126 and the related issues.

  • 2.0.1 - 2020-08-06
    1. Use Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call.
    2. Skip default when iterating exports in __importStar.
    3. Shorter parameter name in __exportStar.
from tslib GitHub release notes
Commit messages
Package name: tslib

Compare


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

@snyk-bot snyk-bot requested a review from a team as a code owner December 5, 2020 08:45
@dbarbato-sf dbarbato-sf merged commit 140f3ed into master Dec 7, 2020
@dbarbato-sf dbarbato-sf deleted the snyk-upgrade-3d4852ed8dd5af07a0499d2483f4a5fc branch December 7, 2020 19:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants