Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update ruff's JSON schema #4131

Conversation

zanieb
Copy link
Contributor

@zanieb zanieb commented Oct 7, 2024

This updates ruff's JSON schema to 42fcbef876a6d0554e04ca73d3ba706947f9ea0f

This updates ruff's JSON schema to [42fcbef876a6d0554e04ca73d3ba706947f9ea0f](astral-sh/ruff@42fcbef)
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 7, 2024

Thanks for the PR!

This section of the codebase is owned by @madskristensen and @hyperupcall - if they write a comment saying "LGTM" then it will be merged.

@hyperupcall
Copy link
Member

Thanks

@hyperupcall hyperupcall merged commit 885ae76 into SchemaStore:master Oct 8, 2024
4 checks passed
@zanieb
Copy link
Contributor Author

zanieb commented Oct 8, 2024

Thank you!

benpops89 pushed a commit to benpops89/schemastore that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2024
@AlexWaygood AlexWaygood deleted the update-ruff-42fcbef876a6d0554e04ca73d3ba706947f9ea0f branch December 12, 2024 16:33
@tylerlaprade
Copy link

lint is still not recognized in this schema for me
image

@hyperupcall
Copy link
Member

hyperupcall commented Jan 2, 2025

@tylerlaprade Support for flake8 tracked in part, in #3564. If you are getting any other issues, please create a new issue instead of commenting on an existing issue so that we can track it

@tylerlaprade
Copy link

@tylerlaprade Support for flake8 tracked in part, in #3564. If you are getting any other issues, please create a new issue instead of commenting on an existing issue so that we can track it

Thanks, but this is for the lint field if ruff.toml, not flake8 in pyproject.toml.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants