-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Re-test enzyme #53
Re-test enzyme #53
Conversation
@Vaibhavdixit02 can you open an issue with a MWE of the error. I'll try to get it quickly thereafter. |
@Vaibhavdixit02 @ChrisRackauckas do you have a MWE (I didn't see one by chance). I'll try to get it fixed quickly |
I literally mentioned this to Chris like 2 hours ago haha, we are on the same page. Would you be able to help review the sparse support here? I started the effort in the previous home for this code https://github.com/SciML/Optimization.jl/pull/688/files I'll revive that |
Ref MWE let's see if the latest release still throws the same error first |
This is now blocking SciML/SciMLSensitivity.jl#1067 |
again, happy to help but need a MWE. In interim just going to be plugging away at mixed activity stuff. |
bumping this |
I have been trying to recreate but ended up with a duplicated returns not handled error instead of the one on CI here - when running OptimizationBase.jl/ext/OptimizationEnzymeExt.jl Lines 368 to 377 in 581f4f8
f2 is incorrect but have been unable to pin down the exact issue yet (I am still trying)
|
That implies type inference fails. Assuming the return is a float, that should likely be changed to the following to explicitly specify that the return is active (if type inference fails)
|
Checklist
contributor guidelines, in particular the SciML Style Guide and
COLPRAC.
Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.