forked from torvalds/linux
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[DT] DSP not described #25
Comments
Sonicadvance1
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 31, 2021
We have the following potential deadlock condition: ======================================================== WARNING: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected 5.10.0-rc2+ #25 Not tainted -------------------------------------------------------- swapper/3/0 just changed the state of lock: ffff8880063bd618 (&host->lock){-...}-{2:2}, at: ata_bmdma_interrupt+0x27/0x200 but this lock took another, HARDIRQ-READ-unsafe lock in the past: (&trig->leddev_list_lock){.+.?}-{2:2} and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them. other info that might help us debug this: Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&trig->leddev_list_lock); local_irq_disable(); lock(&host->lock); lock(&trig->leddev_list_lock); <Interrupt> lock(&host->lock); *** DEADLOCK *** no locks held by swapper/3/0. the shortest dependencies between 2nd lock and 1st lock: -> (&trig->leddev_list_lock){.+.?}-{2:2} ops: 46 { HARDIRQ-ON-R at: lock_acquire+0x15f/0x420 _raw_read_lock+0x42/0x90 led_trigger_event+0x2b/0x70 rfkill_global_led_trigger_worker+0x94/0xb0 process_one_work+0x240/0x560 worker_thread+0x58/0x3d0 kthread+0x151/0x170 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 IN-SOFTIRQ-R at: lock_acquire+0x15f/0x420 _raw_read_lock+0x42/0x90 led_trigger_event+0x2b/0x70 kbd_bh+0x9e/0xc0 tasklet_action_common.constprop.0+0xe9/0x100 tasklet_action+0x22/0x30 __do_softirq+0xcc/0x46d run_ksoftirqd+0x3f/0x70 smpboot_thread_fn+0x116/0x1f0 kthread+0x151/0x170 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 SOFTIRQ-ON-R at: lock_acquire+0x15f/0x420 _raw_read_lock+0x42/0x90 led_trigger_event+0x2b/0x70 rfkill_global_led_trigger_worker+0x94/0xb0 process_one_work+0x240/0x560 worker_thread+0x58/0x3d0 kthread+0x151/0x170 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 INITIAL READ USE at: lock_acquire+0x15f/0x420 _raw_read_lock+0x42/0x90 led_trigger_event+0x2b/0x70 rfkill_global_led_trigger_worker+0x94/0xb0 process_one_work+0x240/0x560 worker_thread+0x58/0x3d0 kthread+0x151/0x170 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 } ... key at: [<ffffffff83da4c00>] __key.0+0x0/0x10 ... acquired at: _raw_read_lock+0x42/0x90 led_trigger_blink_oneshot+0x3b/0x90 ledtrig_disk_activity+0x3c/0xa0 ata_qc_complete+0x26/0x450 ata_do_link_abort+0xa3/0xe0 ata_port_freeze+0x2e/0x40 ata_hsm_qc_complete+0x94/0xa0 ata_sff_hsm_move+0x177/0x7a0 ata_sff_pio_task+0xc7/0x1b0 process_one_work+0x240/0x560 worker_thread+0x58/0x3d0 kthread+0x151/0x170 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> (&host->lock){-...}-{2:2} ops: 69 { IN-HARDIRQ-W at: lock_acquire+0x15f/0x420 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x52/0xa0 ata_bmdma_interrupt+0x27/0x200 __handle_irq_event_percpu+0xd5/0x2b0 handle_irq_event+0x57/0xb0 handle_edge_irq+0x8c/0x230 asm_call_irq_on_stack+0xf/0x20 common_interrupt+0x100/0x1c0 asm_common_interrupt+0x1e/0x40 native_safe_halt+0xe/0x10 arch_cpu_idle+0x15/0x20 default_idle_call+0x59/0x1c0 do_idle+0x22c/0x2c0 cpu_startup_entry+0x20/0x30 start_secondary+0x11d/0x150 secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0xa6/0xab INITIAL USE at: lock_acquire+0x15f/0x420 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x52/0xa0 ata_dev_init+0x54/0xe0 ata_link_init+0x8b/0xd0 ata_port_alloc+0x1f1/0x210 ata_host_alloc+0xf1/0x130 ata_host_alloc_pinfo+0x14/0xb0 ata_pci_sff_prepare_host+0x41/0xa0 ata_pci_bmdma_prepare_host+0x14/0x30 piix_init_one+0x21f/0x600 local_pci_probe+0x48/0x80 pci_device_probe+0x105/0x1c0 really_probe+0x221/0x490 driver_probe_device+0xe9/0x160 device_driver_attach+0xb2/0xc0 __driver_attach+0x91/0x150 bus_for_each_dev+0x81/0xc0 driver_attach+0x1e/0x20 bus_add_driver+0x138/0x1f0 driver_register+0x91/0xf0 __pci_register_driver+0x73/0x80 piix_init+0x1e/0x2e do_one_initcall+0x5f/0x2d0 kernel_init_freeable+0x26f/0x2cf kernel_init+0xe/0x113 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 } ... key at: [<ffffffff83d9fdc0>] __key.6+0x0/0x10 ... acquired at: __lock_acquire+0x9da/0x2370 lock_acquire+0x15f/0x420 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x52/0xa0 ata_bmdma_interrupt+0x27/0x200 __handle_irq_event_percpu+0xd5/0x2b0 handle_irq_event+0x57/0xb0 handle_edge_irq+0x8c/0x230 asm_call_irq_on_stack+0xf/0x20 common_interrupt+0x100/0x1c0 asm_common_interrupt+0x1e/0x40 native_safe_halt+0xe/0x10 arch_cpu_idle+0x15/0x20 default_idle_call+0x59/0x1c0 do_idle+0x22c/0x2c0 cpu_startup_entry+0x20/0x30 start_secondary+0x11d/0x150 secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0xa6/0xab This lockdep splat is reported after: commit e918188 ("locking: More accurate annotations for read_lock()") To clarify: - read-locks are recursive only in interrupt context (when in_interrupt() returns true) - after acquiring host->lock in CPU1, another cpu (i.e. CPU2) may call write_lock(&trig->leddev_list_lock) that would be blocked by CPU0 that holds trig->leddev_list_lock in read-mode - when CPU1 (ata_ac_complete()) tries to read-lock trig->leddev_list_lock, it would be blocked by the write-lock waiter on CPU2 (because we are not in interrupt context, so the read-lock is not recursive) - at this point if an interrupt happens on CPU0 and ata_bmdma_interrupt() is executed it will try to acquire host->lock, that is held by CPU1, that is currently blocked by CPU2, so: * CPU0 blocked by CPU1 * CPU1 blocked by CPU2 * CPU2 blocked by CPU0 *** DEADLOCK *** The deadlock scenario is better represented by the following schema (thanks to Boqun Feng <[email protected]> for the schema and the detailed explanation of the deadlock condition): CPU 0: CPU 1: CPU 2: ----- ----- ----- led_trigger_event(): read_lock(&trig->leddev_list_lock); <workqueue> ata_hsm_qc_complete(): spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock); write_lock(&trig->leddev_list_lock); ata_port_freeze(): ata_do_link_abort(): ata_qc_complete(): ledtrig_disk_activity(): led_trigger_blink_oneshot(): read_lock(&trig->leddev_list_lock); // ^ not in in_interrupt() context, so could get blocked by CPU 2 <interrupt> ata_bmdma_interrupt(): spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock); Fix by using read_lock_irqsave/irqrestore() in led_trigger_event(), so that no interrupt can happen in between, preventing the deadlock condition. Apply the same change to led_trigger_blink_setup() as well, since the same deadlock scenario can also happen in power_supply_update_bat_leds() -> led_trigger_blink() -> led_trigger_blink_setup() (workqueue context), and potentially prevent other similar usages. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201101092614.GB3989@xps-13-7390/ Fixes: eb25cb9 ("leds: convert IDE trigger to common disk trigger") Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Necessary for Audio
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: