create thread from ask result #336
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
1 Skipped Deployment
|
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new feature for creating threads directly from Ask results. A set of components and a custom hook are added to enable users to transform AI-generated content into discussion threads. The implementation includes a modal, a screen for thread creation, and a custom hook that manages form validation and submission. The changes are focused on enhancing user interaction by providing a seamless way to convert AI-generated answers into community discussions. Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant User
participant AskScreen
participant CreateThreadModal
participant CreateThreadScreen
participant API
User->>AskScreen: Completes AI query
AskScreen->>CreateThreadModal: Open modal trigger
CreateThreadModal->>CreateThreadScreen: Render thread creation form
User->>CreateThreadScreen: Fill thread details
User->>CreateThreadScreen: Submit form
CreateThreadScreen->>API: Create thread
API-->>CreateThreadScreen: Thread created
CreateThreadScreen->>CreateThreadModal: Close modal
Poem
Tip CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
web/src/components/ask/CreateThreadFromResultModal/useCreateThreadFromResult.ts (1)
1-9: Imports are well-organized.
The use ofzodResolverandmarkedis a sensible choice. Remove the unuseduseimport from React if it's not needed.-import { use } from "react";
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
web/package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsonweb/yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
web/src/components/ask/CreateThreadFromResultModal/CreateThreadFromResultModal.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/components/ask/CreateThreadFromResultModal/CreateThreadFromResultScreen.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/components/ask/CreateThreadFromResultModal/useCreateThreadFromResult.ts(1 hunks)web/src/screens/ask/AskScreen.tsx(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (23)
web/src/components/ask/CreateThreadFromResultModal/CreateThreadFromResultModal.tsx (6)
1-5: Imports look good.
All referenced modules exist and the usage of useDisclosure is aligned with your custom utility.
6-8: Explicit imports facilitate clarity.
Importing the CreateThreadFromResultScreen and Props types indicates a well-structured file organization.
9-15: Function signature is clear.
Merging UseDisclosureProps with Props is a succinct approach, ensuring less boilerplate and simpler code.
16-30: Well-structured modal usage.
By passing contentMarkdown and sources down to CreateThreadFromResultScreen, you maintain unidirectional data flow, which is consistent with modern React patterns.
32-35: Keep the trigger props minimal and consistent.
Props usage is coherent, and the destructuring approach is good.
36-55: Separation of concerns done well.
Providing a dedicated trigger component that uses useDisclosure internally is a neat design, simplifying the modal’s logic.
web/src/components/ask/CreateThreadFromResultModal/useCreateThreadFromResult.ts (7)
10-15: Clear type definition for references.
DatagraphRef type is straightforward, ensuring that references are documented.
16-21: Well-defined props type.
Bundling contentMarkdown, sources, and onFinish is neat, reflecting the essential inputs for this hook.
22-28: Validation schema is concise.
Using Zod to require category, title, and content ensures robust input validation.
29-33: Efficient HTML generation.
Parsing contentMarkdown synchronously with marked is efficient for the typical use case.
34-44: Form instantiation is correct.
The defaultValues for category, title, and content appear well-structured. Confirm you support empty or undefined category if that's valid.
45-56: Good asynchronous flow.
Wrapping threadCreate in handle is consistent with your error-handling approach. The await usage is correct.
58-65: Return object is well-scoped.
Having form, contentHTML, and handlers in a single object simplifies usage in the UI.
web/src/components/ask/CreateThreadFromResultModal/CreateThreadFromResultScreen.tsx (7)
1-10: Imports are grouped logically.
Maintaining distinct categories (category, content, UI components) helps with maintainability.
11-12: Importing hook and types together is straightforward.
This promotes a clear contract between the screen component and the underlying hook.
13-15: Custom hook usage is straightforward.
Extracting form, contentHTML, and handlers from useCreateThreadFromResult is well-structured.
16-23: Title form field is clear.
Labeling with FormHelperText plus the error text fosters good UX.
24-28: Category form control is intuitive.
Using a dedicated CategorySelect component is a good modular design practice.
30-38: Content field is well-connected.
Initializing via initialValue={contentHTML} is consistent with your approach for posts.
40-54: Form actions are laid out effectively.
“Cancel” triggers props.onFinish, and “Post” uses the form submission logic, ensuring a nice user flow.
web/src/screens/ask/AskScreen.tsx (3)
12-12: Trigger import is consistent with the new modal.
This fosters a clear separation between the screen logic and the thread creation mechanism.
187-188: Finishing condition looks robust.
Setting isFinishedWithResult to true when isLoading is false and content is non-empty is logical.
218-239: Conditional rendering provides a seamless UX.
Showing the thread creation trigger only if there is final content prevents user confusion and leads to a succinct interface.
idk if actually useful tbh...