-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 52
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Panic in add_constraint_and_split
#113
Comments
Thanks for the report! I'll try to look into that soon. In the meantime, you could consider to fork the repository and remove that assertion if it's a blocker for you - it's probably not too important. I'll know more once I've looked into that. |
This one is annoying. When using Note that vertex 3 and 4 overlap visually but they do not share the same position - it's ever so slightly different. There is also a constraint edge going from 1->4, it's just being visually overlapped by the regular edge 1->3. This triangulation correctly represents the split and has 4 constraint edges: 0->4, 2->4, 3->4 and 1->4 However, for What an annoying edge case 😄 . I'm working on a fix. |
Fixed in v2.12.1 (just released) - thanks again for the report 💯 |
This test case panics:
It panics on this assertion:
spade/src/cdt.rs
Line 876 in bddafbb
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: