-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug: Remapping of numbers (specifically 0) breaks consecutive counting started with non-remapped number-keys #2831
Comments
Experiencing this behavior as well; I find the 0 -> ^ remapping to be pretty popular and this bug is causing jumping to lines with a 0 in them impossible, as it's interpreting the 0 as a BOL movement. |
Any chance eyes could be put on this? Have been using workarounds for this to navigate around my code for a while. |
Pretty sure this has been fixed in one of the recent updates. Can not reproduce. |
@davidnorthetal, just tried it on my instance and seems to be fixed. Thanks for the update! Now to unlearn the "wrong" method I muscle memory'd for the work around haha |
Is this a BUG REPORT or FEATURE REQUEST? (choose one):
BUG
I happen to notice that #2793 breaks the count feature, so once I remap 0 to ^, doing something like
20j
instead of going 20 lines down, it goes one line down after setting the cursor to the beginning of the current line.You might argue that works as intended but it is not how Vim behaves, In my vimrc I have simply:
and
20j
still jumps down 20 lines fine. while0
outside of a started count works as expectedin my user-settings I use:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: