Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bugfix: Support multiple messages for the same Event ID #31

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 17, 2025

Conversation

scudette
Copy link
Contributor

Some event ID have multiple messages stored in the message lists - these are generally designed for events which have different number of properties. So for example the message file might contain two messages for the same event id, one with 1 expansion and one with 2 expansions. Then the application might emit an event to the log file with 2 properties or only 1 property of the same event id.

This pr stores both the messages and the number of expasions in the message set and is able to select the most appropriate one for each message - we aim to maximize the number of expasions available in the message string.

Some event ID have multiple messages stored in the message lists -
these are generally designed for events which have different number of
properties. So for example the message file might contain two messages
for the same event id, one with 1 expansion and one with 2
expansions. Then the application might emit an event to the log file
with 2 properties or only 1 property of the same event id.

This pr stores both the messages and the number of expasions in the
message set and is able to select the most appropriate one for each
message - we aim to maximize the number of expasions available in the
message string.
@scudette scudette merged commit e5cd153 into master Jan 17, 2025
3 checks passed
@scudette scudette deleted the multiplemessages branch January 17, 2025 00:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant