Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updating the visualization examples to Paraview 5.9.1 #8

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 12, 2021

Conversation

kmruehl
Copy link
Contributor

@kmruehl kmruehl commented Jul 2, 2021

Updating the visualization examples to Paraview 5.9.1. This PR does the following:

  • Updates *.pvsm state files for both WEC-Sim_Application cases with Paraview 5.9.1
  • Updates README for WEC-Sim_Application cases to specify Paraview 5.9.1 and WEC-Sim v4.2

This PR relates to WEC-Sim/WEC-Sim#595 and WEC-Sim/WEC-Sim#459

@kmruehl kmruehl added the bug label Jul 2, 2021
@kmruehl kmruehl marked this pull request as ready for review July 10, 2021 00:15
@kmruehl
Copy link
Contributor Author

kmruehl commented Jul 10, 2021

@cmichelenstrofer or @akeeste can one of you verify that the updated state files are working? Thank you!

@akeeste
Copy link
Contributor

akeeste commented Jul 12, 2021

@kmruehl Yes I am able to load the new *.pvsm state files for both the OSWEC and the RM3

@kmruehl
Copy link
Contributor Author

kmruehl commented Jul 12, 2021

@akeeste thank you!

@kmruehl kmruehl merged commit e2667e1 into WEC-Sim:master Jul 12, 2021
@kmruehl kmruehl deleted the bugfix_paraview branch July 12, 2021 16:08
Copy link
Contributor

@cmichelenstrofer cmichelenstrofer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It works, can be merged. Some suggestion for future improvements:

  • Add segment tensions to the one of the RM3 views (maybe make the lines thicker too)
  • Remove the specific path "C:/kmruehl/..." from the .pvsm files. "files from state path" will not work either way but at least we are not pushing paths specific to one computer
  • Ideally we would create multiple views without creating multiple copies of the objects (right now there are 3 grounds, 3 waves ,etc.)

@kmruehl
Copy link
Contributor Author

kmruehl commented Jul 14, 2021

@cmichelenstrofer thank you! Yes, I agree those are great suggestions. I'll open an issue with those suggestions. Looks like I merged the PR right before your review.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants