WinRM V2

[sneal]

closes #106, #105, #169, #197, #203, #208, #194

[mwrock]

Got Powershell running here with equivelent functionality as the spike. Just need to properly parse the powershell output from the binary blob.

Connection.shell now takes a block and will close the shell when the block completes if given. While the finalizer should take care of this, this allows for earlier freeing of the connection if necessary.

Also added a run_wql right off of connection since wql is not run in a shell.

[mwrock]

Found some time to get back to this last night. The MessageFactory now has a parse_bytes method that can create a psrp message from raw bytes. I added accessors for each part described in the spec. Currently we munge fragments into the outer message shell but we can decompose that when we need to.

There is an additional decoder now specifically for powershell however we may soon need to break up the output processor as well. This will all definitely need some refactoring after the rest of the output handling is added.

Currently it can handle basic powershell output. It cant yet handle error responses nor does it deal well with commands containing quotes and line endings. So thats gonna be next.

[mwrock]

Just rebased on top of current master. Both unit and integration tests are green "on my machine" but looks like something is not appveyor friendly.

Beyond fixing appveyor there is some rather heinous stuff going on in output processing with the message_types and code duplication. Will clean that up.

[sneal]

@mwrock Exciting! I plan to get back to this sometime later this week.

[chris-rock]

Guys, you do awesome work!

[sneal]

Finally looking at this again for the first time in a few months...

[sneal]

Since we're breaking backwards compatibility, I'd like to have the Output class not be a Hash.

[mwrock]

Sounds good @sneal. I'm thinking of essentially just exposing an exitcode method and, at least for now, keeping a internal hash to track the data so much of the inner Output code will remain the same you just won't be able to access it as a hash. That sound good?

[mwrock]

@sneal Here is what I have the output looking like: https://gist.github.com/mwrock/470d06301dff66c2b20b41d67c39a62a

[mwrock]

I'll be adding yard docs, etc, etc

[mwrock]

Updated Output and added commits to all downstream PRs

[sneal]

@mwrock It just got real!

[mwrock]

oh yeah!