-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add docs for LocalAutosaveMonitor and __experimentalUpdateLocalAutosaveInterval #19915
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
20 changes: 20 additions & 0 deletions
20
packages/editor/src/components/local-autosave-monitor/README.md
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ | ||
# LocalAutosaveMonitor | ||
|
||
`LocalAutosaveMonitor` is a component based on `AutosaveMonitor` that ensures that a local copy of the current post is regularly saved in `sessionStorage`. Additionally, it will: | ||
|
||
- attempt to clear the local copy if a copy is successful saved on the server; | ||
- warn the user upon loading a post that there is a local copy that can be loaded; | ||
- defer to remote autosaves, if any is available. | ||
|
||
`LocalAutosaveMonitor` observes a saving interval defined specifically for local autosaves, in contrast with remote (server-side) autosaving. See editor setting `__experimentalLocalAutosaveInterval` and setter `__experimentalUpdateLocalAutosaveInterval`. | ||
|
||
## Example | ||
|
||
```js | ||
const MyLayout = () => ( | ||
<main> | ||
<LocalAutosaveMonitor /> | ||
<MyEditor /> | ||
</main> | ||
); | ||
``` |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This won't actually be documented in the data handbook as long as it's experimental:
https://developer.wordpress.org/block-editor/data/data-core-editor/#actions
If we want to document it, are we also wanting to make it stable?
Related: #17743
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I came just for the documentation, regardless of its experimental status, but was wondering the same. On one hand, it's been a few months since the introduction of this API and it hasn't required any changes. On the other hand, it's arguably a very isolated piece that seldom receives attention, so its lack of change isn't necessarily indicative of soundness or stability.
For instance, I'm wondering whether this functionality might be better provided by something else, whether that's something generic to more editor settings, whether there's room for it in the recently proposed Features API, etc. WDYT?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Admittedly, I still haven't got around to digest the implementation on the whole, so I can't really speak to specifics about whether it's something we want to commit to. If you're already considering options for potential reimplementations, then I think it would be fair to keep it experimental. Or, at least, it shouldn't necessarily block this pull request, which is an improvement in its own right.
I'm also mindful of our human aversions to committing to anything as final and, given the choice, we'd make everything "experimental" forever. So, there's that ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ . It's always a balance.