Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Investigate possibility of using a library as JWT implementation #3

Open
siepkes opened this issue Sep 19, 2017 · 0 comments
Open

Investigate possibility of using a library as JWT implementation #3

siepkes opened this issue Sep 19, 2017 · 0 comments

Comments

@siepkes
Copy link
Member

siepkes commented Sep 19, 2017

wrensec-commons Contains it's own JWT implementation (dating back from it's ForgeRock roots). However maintaining a well tested and documented JWT implementation is no small feat. In the future the JWT specification might even be extended forcing us to implement those new pieces.

The idea is that maintaining our own JWT implementation doesn't offer us an advantage over other IAM solutions. Therefor we should investigate if we can replace it with a well documented, maintained and tested JWT library and so off loading the maintenance burden.

Examples of Java JWT libraries are:

pavelhoral pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 21, 2022
karelmaxa pushed a commit to karelmaxa/wrensec-commons that referenced this issue Oct 26, 2022
…afe-messages

Fixes handling of special chars in Javadocs
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant