Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix apply efficiency #187

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 2, 2024
Merged

Fix apply efficiency #187

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 2, 2024

Conversation

hammannr
Copy link
Collaborator

@hammannr hammannr commented Aug 2, 2024

Turns out the apply_efficiency key, which was removed in #183 had a reason. It is propagated to blueice here. If it is not provided, the efficiency is correctly added to the alea likelihood (since #183) but not taken into account in the likelihood evaluation.
This PR fixes this by automatically adding the key to the blueice config in case a efficiency_name is provided.

@hammannr hammannr added the bugfix label Aug 2, 2024
@hammannr hammannr requested a review from dachengx August 2, 2024 11:32
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Aug 2, 2024

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 10214875333

Details

  • 2 of 2 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.07%) to 92.235%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 10182687704: 0.07%
Covered Lines: 1568
Relevant Lines: 1700

💛 - Coveralls

@hammannr hammannr merged commit 19c87cb into main Aug 2, 2024
7 checks passed
@hammannr hammannr deleted the fix_apply_efficiency branch August 2, 2024 11:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants