-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Separate above- and below-gate drift of electrons #178
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the PR @zihaoxu98! I have just some minor comments and will later test run the code.
For me the PR looks good! Thanks for implementing the requested changes! As soon as the corresponding config file PR is merged we can merge this one too. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I will click on approve now but we should wait with merging until the config was updated.
Thanks, @zihaoxu98! This looks good. See comments in https://github.com/XENONnT/private_nt_aux_files/pull/305 to fine-tune the configs setting for this part of the code. |
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 8630166242Details
💛 - Coveralls |
@zihaoxu98 will this change also be applied to SR0 results? Then shall we change SR0 map? |
This PR slightly modifies the drift process, to be consistent with the definition from the study shown in this note. This requires an additional parameter liquid_level, which is added back in https://github.com/XENONnT/private_nt_aux_files/pull/305