Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Separate above- and below-gate drift of electrons #178

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Apr 10, 2024
Merged

Conversation

zihaoxu98
Copy link
Contributor

@zihaoxu98 zihaoxu98 commented Mar 21, 2024

This PR slightly modifies the drift process, to be consistent with the definition from the study shown in this note. This requires an additional parameter liquid_level, which is added back in https://github.com/XENONnT/private_nt_aux_files/pull/305

@zihaoxu98 zihaoxu98 marked this pull request as ready for review March 27, 2024 13:40
Copy link
Collaborator

@HenningSE HenningSE left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the PR @zihaoxu98! I have just some minor comments and will later test run the code.

@HenningSE
Copy link
Collaborator

For me the PR looks good! Thanks for implementing the requested changes! As soon as the corresponding config file PR is merged we can merge this one too.

Copy link
Collaborator

@HenningSE HenningSE left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I will click on approve now but we should wait with merging until the config was updated.

@ramirezdiego
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks, @zihaoxu98! This looks good. See comments in https://github.com/XENONnT/private_nt_aux_files/pull/305 to fine-tune the configs setting for this part of the code.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Apr 9, 2024

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 8630166242

Details

  • 12 of 12 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.08%) to 68.554%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 8630118712: 0.08%
Covered Lines: 1840
Relevant Lines: 2684

💛 - Coveralls

@ramirezdiego ramirezdiego merged commit 10606a9 into main Apr 10, 2024
4 checks passed
@ramirezdiego ramirezdiego deleted the s2_width branch April 10, 2024 12:41
@dachengx
Copy link
Contributor

@zihaoxu98 will this change also be applied to SR0 results? Then shall we change SR0 map?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants