You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 11, 2024. It is now read-only.
Post the native Oculus update, when a new config asset is created that has single axis configuration, it is incorrectly being identified as "custom" data (as used by Oculus today)
To Reproduce
Create new OpenVR Controller profile
Examine asset to find "InputName" populated instead of "AxisX" for single axis config
Expected behavior
Single Axis configuration should be recorded in the AxisX field
Actual behavior
Single Axis configuration is being recorded in the custom "InputName" field
Your Setup (please complete the following information)
Unity Version 2019.1.14
XRTK Version 0.1.19
Target Platform (please complete the following information)
WMR immersive
OpenVR
Additional context
Simply requires single axis configuration to provide an empty second axis
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No, the constructor is fine. However with the requirement to have custom data for Oculus inputs, this overrides the "defaulted" approach for Axis data. So inputs requiring axis data need to provide two axis.
I support I could also update the Axis based constructor to make the second argument not optional.
XRTK - Mixed Reality Toolkit Bug Report
Describe the bug
Post the native Oculus update, when a new config asset is created that has single axis configuration, it is incorrectly being identified as "custom" data (as used by Oculus today)
To Reproduce
Expected behavior
Single Axis configuration should be recorded in the AxisX field
Actual behavior
Single Axis configuration is being recorded in the custom "InputName" field
Your Setup (please complete the following information)
Target Platform (please complete the following information)
Additional context
Simply requires single axis configuration to provide an empty second axis
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: