-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 68
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Invalid command generated when Dave requests a parameter that has not been initialized #79
Comments
As an additional aspect of this issue, Dave with crash when a second attempt is made to validate a sequence after this issue occurs. Otherwise, Dave is capable of validating a sequence that has previously failed to validate (either due to a missing parameter or existing file). |
Could you post the trace back(s)? |
There is no trace back. Dave simply mistakes a valid command for an
invalid one.
Dave then freezes when validation is run again. And, unfortunately, there
is no trace back either.
Best
Jeff
…On Sat, May 12, 2018, 8:57 PM Hazen Babcock ***@***.***> wrote:
Could you post the trace back(s)?
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#79 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACiQXDYWWQRQtwJjCKSkT9StSXR8N3rkks5tx4TugaJpZM4T8jAO>
.
|
Does it work properly if you set 'parallel_mode' in tcp_control to False? |
Ignore the above. This might be related to #84? If not I'm going to need a simple action sequence that duplicates the problem, or an in person demonstration of the problem. |
Dave generates an invalid command when validating a command for set parameters if that parameter has been loaded into hal but not yet selected.
This issue may arise from the extra time that hal requires to initialize the parameter when it is activated for the first time.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: