Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Documentation says 9.1 even when 9.2 is also available #31

Closed
jimcruse opened this issue Jan 1, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

Documentation says 9.1 even when 9.2 is also available #31

jimcruse opened this issue Jan 1, 2020 · 2 comments
Assignees
@abhiTronix
Labels
Docs 📚 Wiki Documentaion related Enhancement 😃 New Feature/Addition/Improvement Solved 🎏 Goal Achieved!

Comments

@jimcruse
Copy link

jimcruse commented Jan 1, 2020

Documentation says latest gcc vs 9.1 even though 9.2 is available, on your sourceforge site...
I know it actually has both 9.1 and 9.2 it just gets confusing
And I think you should get credit for being 9.2 , which I've been using for a month or so..
@abhiTronix
Copy link
Owner

@jimcruse Sure, doing it now.

@abhiTronix abhiTronix self-assigned this Jan 1, 2020
@abhiTronix abhiTronix added Docs 📚 Wiki Documentaion related Enhancement 😃 New Feature/Addition/Improvement labels Jan 1, 2020
abhiTronix added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 2, 2020
@abhiTronix
Docs Updates
5663480 
- Updated Docs and badges.
- Rewritten Docs & ReadME with accurate illustrations (Fixes issue #30)
- Updated GCC version to 9.2.0.(Fixes issue #31)
- Removed Redundant bash script tools.
@abhiTronix
Copy link
Owner

Successfully resolved in commit 5663480

@abhiTronix abhiTronix added the Solved 🎏 Goal Achieved! label Jan 2, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@abhiTronix abhiTronix

Labels
Docs 📚 Wiki Documentaion related Enhancement 😃 New Feature/Addition/Improvement Solved 🎏 Goal Achieved!
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@abhiTronix @jimcruse