-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 573
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
False positives in CocoaLumberjack #2551
Comments
Thank you for the report! |
This is the same as #2603 that I closed as a duplicate of this. Carrying over the notes from there:
|
Note that the latest develop branch has these results:
.... this is better but not prefect yet. |
This project has an odd licensing with a complicated history Reference: CocoaLumberjack/CocoaLumberjack#1116 Reference: CocoaLumberjack/CocoaLumberjack#936 Reference: CocoaLumberjack/CocoaLumberjack#696 Reference: #2551 Reference: #2603 Reported-by: Marcel Bochtler <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Philippe Ombredanne <[email protected]>
This is fixed in the current develop, attaching scan results for CocoaLumberjack. |
Description
ScanCode reports
GPL-1.0-or-later
in multiple CocoaLumberjack files, although it declares the BSD Source Code Attribution License.Example files:
and more
How To Reproduce
Scan https://github.com/CocoaLumberjack/CocoaLumberjack with ScanCode.
System configuration
Linux
3.2.1-rc2
Bootstrapped via ORT.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: