Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rework cli.py to use a Resource class instead of iterating paths #736

Closed
yashdsaraf opened this issue Aug 22, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

Comments

@yashdsaraf
Copy link
Collaborator

For now the goal is to create a Resource class which stores paths and infos for a resource.
Eventually this class should hold all the scanned data for a resource and encapsulate the caching logic entirely.

yashdsaraf added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 23, 2017
yashdsaraf added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 23, 2017
yashdsaraf added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 23, 2017
yashdsaraf added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 23, 2017
yashdsaraf added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 23, 2017
yashdsaraf added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 24, 2017
yashdsaraf added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 31, 2017
yashdsaraf added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 6, 2017
yashdsaraf added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 6, 2017
yashdsaraf added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 10, 2017
yashdsaraf added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 10, 2017
yashdsaraf added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 10, 2017
  * Update doc for `resource_paths`

Signed-off-by: Yash D. Saraf <[email protected]>
pombredanne pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 22, 2017
pombredanne pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 22, 2017
pombredanne pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 22, 2017
  * Update doc for `resource_paths`

Signed-off-by: Yash D. Saraf <[email protected]>
@pombredanne
Copy link
Member

This has been fixed in #885 !

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants