Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fgdc entity-attribute information not supported by mdJson/mdTranslator #129

Closed
14 tasks
stansmith907 opened this issue Sep 6, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed
14 tasks

Comments

@stansmith907
Copy link
Contributor

stansmith907 commented Sep 6, 2017

Working though the FGDC entity-attribute section (5) I found much of the information not supported by our mdTranslator and mdJson schemas. This is likely because we patterned mdTranslator dataDictionary on SQL table creation requirements. Also, ISO implements data dictionaries using FC_FeatureCatalogue which optimistically is a poor fit.

FGDC has additional fields that could enrich our description of entities and attributes that we may wish to adopt even if we can only move a few of them to ISO metadata records. If all these fields were added we could accurately describe ASCII CSV or tabular datasets in addition to SQL and spreadsheets.

  • attribute definition external reference (is in FC_FeatureCatalogue)
  • attribute unit measurement resolution
  • attribute measurement frequency
  • attribute {begin date / end date}n
  • attribute accuracy (likely in ISO 19157)
  • case sensitive (Boolean)
  • field width
    and others that could be added to entity
  • entity definition external reference (is in FC_FeatureCatalogue)
  • missing value code
  • field separation character
  • number of header lines
  • quote character [ single | double ]
    and others that could be added to domain
  • domain definition external reference (is in FC_FeatureCatalogue)
  • unrepresentable domain (text description)
@stansmith907 stansmith907 added enhancement Improve or modify an existing feature question Information is needed, includes user support requests labels Sep 6, 2017
@dwalt
Copy link
Collaborator

dwalt commented Sep 6, 2017 via email

@stansmith907 stansmith907 added extension and removed enhancement Improve or modify an existing feature question Information is needed, includes user support requests labels Sep 22, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants