Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix: Account type refactoring CoreData migration #627

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 4, 2024
Merged

Conversation

Rotheem
Copy link
Member

@Rotheem Rotheem commented Dec 4, 2024

Description

Please explain the changes you made here.

Checklist

  • Created tests which fail without the change (if possible)
  • All tests passing
  • Extended the documentation, if necessary

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 4, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.31%. Comparing base (8196515) to head (cfb22d4).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #627   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   81.31%   81.31%           
=======================================
  Files         129      129           
  Lines       10013    10013           
=======================================
  Hits         8142     8142           
  Misses       1871     1871           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@armanddidierjean armanddidierjean changed the title Fix: Account type refactoring Fix: Account type refactoring CoreData migration Dec 4, 2024
@armanddidierjean armanddidierjean added core fix bug This PR fix a bug labels Dec 4, 2024
@Rotheem Rotheem merged commit 66e7531 into main Dec 4, 2024
9 checks passed
@armanddidierjean armanddidierjean deleted the fix-account-type branch December 4, 2024 13:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core fix bug This PR fix a bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants