Fix: Handle missing config in CLI validate command for destinations
#546
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes made in the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant CLI
participant Destination
User->>CLI: Invoke validate command
CLI->>CLI: Call _resolve_destination_job(config=None)
CLI->>Destination: Get destination with config_dict=None
Destination-->>CLI: Return destination info
CLI-->>User: Output result
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
airbyte/cli.py (1)
Line range hint
332-334: How about adding more descriptive error handling for config validation? wdyt?When config is provided but invalid, we could provide more context about what went wrong. For example:
if config: print("Running connector check...") - config_dict: dict[str, Any] = _resolve_config(config) + try: + config_dict: dict[str, Any] = _resolve_config(config) + except PyAirbyteInputError as e: + print(f"Failed to validate config: {e.message}") + if e.context: + print("Additional context:", e.context) + raise
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
airbyte/cli.py(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
airbyte/cli.py (1)
Learnt from: aaronsteers
PR: airbytehq/PyAirbyte#416
File: airbyte/cli.py:337-343
Timestamp: 2024-11-10T16:30:14.198Z
Learning: In the `validate` function, when calling `_resolve_source_job` and `_resolve_destination_job`, the `config` parameter is intentionally set to `None` because configuration is processed in a separate step later.
🔇 Additional comments (2)
airbyte/cli.py (2)
265-265: LGTM! Nice improvement to config handling 👍
The change to make config_dict optional aligns well with the validate command's needs and matches the pattern used in _resolve_source_job. This fixes the issue of handling missing config in destination validate command.
265-265: Let's verify all callers handle None config correctly
The change to make config optional could affect other callers of this function.
✅ Verification successful
Looks good! The None config handling is properly implemented
From the verification results, I can see that:
- The
Destinationclass is designed to handleNoneconfig (it's explicitly typed asconfig: dict[str, Any] | None = None) - All callers of
_resolve_destination_jobeither pass an explicit config orNone - The config resolution is handled safely with
config_dict = _resolve_config(config) if config else None
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for all calls to _resolve_destination_job
rg "_resolve_destination_job\(" --type py -A 3 -B 3
# Search for potential error handling around these calls
rg "PyAirbyteInputError.*config" --type py -A 3 -B 3
Length of output: 1202
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the implementation of _resolve_destination_job to understand how it handles None config
ast-grep --pattern $'def _resolve_destination_job(
$$$
) {
$$$
}'
# Also check for any error handling or validation of config parameter
rg "config.*None" --type py -A 3 -B 3 airbyte/cli.py
Length of output: 2562
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check how the Destination class handles None config
ast-grep --pattern $'class Destination {
$$$
}'
# And check for any validation or handling of config in the Destination class
rg "def.*__init__.*Destination" --type py -A 5 -B 1
Length of output: 104
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different pattern to find the Destination class definition
rg "class Destination" --type py -A 10 -B 1
# And check how config is used in destination-related code
rg "Destination.*config" --type py -A 3 -B 3
Length of output: 1776
aaronsteers
changed the title
validate command for destinations
aaronsteers
changed the title
validate command for destinationsvalidate command for destinations
aaronsteers
deleted the
aj/fix/resolve-destination-validate-cli-failure-with-no-config
branch
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
New Features