Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Logo consortium too small #1631

Closed
lauraroverts opened this issue Jun 24, 2015 · 3 comments
Closed

Logo consortium too small #1631

lauraroverts opened this issue Jun 24, 2015 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@lauraroverts
Copy link

Added the WASH Alliance logo to http://rsr.akvo.org/en/project/475/. It's quite small. Would it be possible to display it slightly bigger, like the logo that is being used at the Akvo Pages http://washalliance.akvoapp.org/en/project/475/?

Test plan

GIVEN the project page
WHEN a project has a keyword
AND the keyword has a logo indicated
THEN the logo should be displayed on the project page with the same size as the logo in the header of Akvo Pages

@lauraroverts lauraroverts added this to the 3.5 Islamabad milestone Jun 24, 2015
@kardan kardan self-assigned this Jun 25, 2015
@kardan kardan closed this as completed in e78d9f2 Jun 30, 2015
kardan added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 30, 2015
[Fixes #1631] Keyword logos same size as RSR page logo.
@rumca
Copy link
Contributor

rumca commented Jul 15, 2015

Looks like this now:

screen shot 2015-07-15 at 10 12 15

which I assume is a passing test 👍

@KasperBrandt
Copy link
Contributor

Not the best design, but I guess the times that we have to display 2 logos are rare anyway.. At least the text is readable, that's more important.

@lauraroverts
Copy link
Author

Looks a bit weird having the logos stick to each other. Size seems good.

@MichaelAkvo MichaelAkvo moved this to Done in RSR Dec 8, 2022
@MichaelAkvo MichaelAkvo added this to RSR Dec 8, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants