Fix warning in AdditiveNoise

[ternaus]

Fixes: #2270

Summary by Sourcery

Validate noise parameters using the appropriate NoiseParams class and store the validated parameters as a dictionary.

Bug Fixes:

• Fix a warning caused by incorrect noise parameter validation in AdditiveNoise.

Build:

• Update ruff pre-commit hook to v0.9.1.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request fixes a warning raised by the static type checker ruff by ensuring that noise parameters are validated before being used. It also updates ruff to v0.9.1.

Sequence diagram for noise parameter validation in AdditiveNoise

sequenceDiagram
    participant AN as AdditiveNoise
    participant NP as NoiseParams Classes
    AN->>AN: validate_noise_params()
    Note over AN: Get default params if none provided
    AN->>AN: Add noise_type to params_dict
    AN->>NP: Create NoiseParams object
    NP-->>AN: Return validated params
    AN->>AN: Store validated params as dict
    Note over AN: Return self

Loading

Class diagram for AdditiveNoise parameter validation

classDiagram
    class AdditiveNoise {
        +noise_type: str
        +noise_params: dict
        +validate_noise_params() Self
    }
    class NoiseParams {
        <<interface>>
        +noise_type: str
        +model_dump() dict
    }
    class UniformParams {
        +noise_type: str
    }
    class GaussianParams {
        +noise_type: str
    }
    class PoissonParams {
        +noise_type: str
    }
    class BetaParams {
        +noise_type: str
    }
    NoiseParams <|-- UniformParams
    NoiseParams <|-- GaussianParams
    NoiseParams <|-- PoissonParams
    NoiseParams <|-- BetaParams
    AdditiveNoise ..> NoiseParams: uses

Loading

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Validate noise parameters before use	Added validation of noise parameters using the appropriate NoiseParams class. Stored the validated noise parameters as a dictionary.	albumentations/augmentations/transforms.py
Updated ruff version	Updated ruff from v0.8.6 to v0.9.1 in the pre-commit configuration file.	.pre-commit-config.yaml

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
  this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @ternaus - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟢 General issues: all looks good
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 97.56098% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 89.84%. Comparing base (b1a79c2) to head (e7d4eac).
Report is 376 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
albumentations/augmentations/blur/functional.py	83.33%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           main    #2271       +/-   ##
=========================================
+ Coverage      0   89.84%   +89.84%     
=========================================
  Files         0       50       +50     
  Lines         0     8829     +8829     
=========================================
+ Hits          0     7932     +7932     
- Misses        0      897      +897     

Flag	Coverage Δ
ubuntu-py3.12	89.84% <97.56%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.