Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

#175 duplicate additional-field.name validation added #256

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 1, 2017
Merged

#175 duplicate additional-field.name validation added #256

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 1, 2017

Conversation

Praitheesh
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-1.0%) to 52.839% when pulling bedd428 on Praitheesh:175_unique_addtional_fields into 3217fad on exteso:master.

3 similar comments
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-1.0%) to 52.839% when pulling bedd428 on Praitheesh:175_unique_addtional_fields into 3217fad on exteso:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-1.0%) to 52.839% when pulling bedd428 on Praitheesh:175_unique_addtional_fields into 3217fad on exteso:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jan 28, 2017 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-1.0%) to 52.839% when pulling bedd428 on Praitheesh:175_unique_addtional_fields into 3217fad on exteso:master.

@cbellone cbellone merged commit e066eb1 into alfio-event:master Feb 1, 2017
@cbellone
Copy link
Member

cbellone commented Feb 1, 2017

merged. Thanks @Praitheesh !!

@Praitheesh Praitheesh deleted the 175_unique_addtional_fields branch February 1, 2017 22:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@Praitheesh @coveralls @cbellone