-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 339
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Decide and document how to release a patch fix for GOV.UK Frontend if there are unreleased changes on main #1958
Comments
We should probably also consider how we manage backwards compatibility, for instance if after releasing 4.0.0 we need to release an urgent patch fixes 4.0.1 and 3.9.2. |
Following a review, we've documented what we want to test in https://docs.google.com/document/d/1avJPHEJ4hENt5LEcMwxp90zl1WS72Tx6qdoN2JOhXCE/edit#heading=h.5s859hln1k0l |
Following a conversation with Ollie and Vanita, the next steps are:
edit: I've moved these actions to the Done when list and split the Problem 3 into #2004 |
I've spoken to Eion about the draft doc. We've agreed that it would be good to avoid massive duplication between the 'Publishing' doc and this new one. I'm going to put together a very rough draft to see what the two publishing processes would like if compiled into one doc and Eion will then review it to see if it's viable to keep everything in that one doc. We should also bear in mind that there might yet be a third process (solution to Problem 3) added to that doc in the future too. |
@hannalaakso Nice going on the draft doc! It was useful to see the two processes beside each other. My vote would be for separate docs (if that complies with current Design System convention). As a user, I find it easier to consume information when each doc has one overarching objective. Also, if the two processes are in the one doc, that could make the doc rather long. (Maybe there's context I'm unaware of, though.) Re duplication, it looked (to my untrained eye) like the processes are sufficiently different to publish separately. What are your thoughts, @36degrees and @vanitabarrett ? |
@hannalaakso @EoinShaughnessy I think having separate docs makes sense if they're sufficiently different. Do you think there is a point at which the two would/could converge? For example: if the steps for releasing a patch fix are different up until the point you actually check out the branch and run the npm commands to publish. |
@vanitabarrett @36degrees Here's the draft doc to review: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ybq_DonZqzX1vOrwxUmXC_ff9Yazdqn7ToEDVVay6ec/edit# |
We trialled this process when releasing 3.14.0 and it went really well - no hiccups! Where anything in the document needed clarifying or tweaking, I've added some suggestions (I think there was only one). @EoinShaughnessy I think the next step for this is probably for you to take another look at the document to make sure you're happy with it. After that, we can raise a PR to publish it on Github. I'm going to move this card into the Backlog now until you have time to pick it up |
Hi @vanitabarrett, I've reviewed the doc, edited some bits and added some comments: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ybq_DonZqzX1vOrwxUmXC_ff9Yazdqn7ToEDVVay6ec/edit# |
@vanitabarrett Doc is looking good! Just 3 dev comments to address - would you be able to take a look? Once we've resolved those, I can raise a PR to publish on GitHub. |
@vanitabarrett @EoinShaughnessy had a look over the doc, apart from a couple of small comments it looks good to me! |
Thanks @lfdebrux! |
Closes #1958 Documentation for releasing a patch fix (e.g: urgent or security fix) when there are unreleased changes on `main` that can't go out yet.
Closes #1958 Documentation for releasing a patch fix (e.g: urgent or security fix) when there are unreleased changes on `main` that can't go out yet.
Closes #1958 Documentation for releasing a patch fix (e.g: urgent or security fix) when there are unreleased changes on `main` that can't go out yet.
Closes #1958 Documentation for releasing a patch fix (e.g: urgent or security fix) when there are unreleased changes on `main` that can't go out yet.
Closes #1958 Documentation for releasing a patch fix (e.g: urgent or security fix) when there are unreleased changes on `main` that can't go out yet.
Closes #1958 Documentation for releasing a patch fix (e.g: urgent or security fix) when there are unreleased changes on `main` that can't go out yet.
Closes #1958 Documentation for releasing a patch fix (e.g: urgent or security fix) when there are unreleased changes on `main` that can't go out yet.
Closes #1958 Documentation for releasing a patch fix (e.g: urgent or security fix) when there are unreleased changes on `main` that can't go out yet.
Closes #1958 Documentation for releasing a patch fix (e.g: urgent or security fix) when there are unreleased changes on `main` that can't go out yet.
Closes #1958 Documentation for releasing a patch fix (e.g: urgent or security fix) when there are unreleased changes on `main` that can't go out yet.
Closes #1958 Documentation for releasing a patch fix (e.g: urgent or security fix) when there are unreleased changes on `main` that can't go out yet.
Closes alphagov#1958 Documentation for releasing a patch fix (e.g: urgent or security fix) when there are unreleased changes on `main` that can't go out yet.
What
In the run up to Frontend v4.0.0 (a breaking release) we should consider how we manage the source code in case we need to do a hotfix release when there are unreleased changes on the main branch that are not in a releasable state.
Why
If we needed to do a hotfix release prior to v4.0.0 we should know in advance the exact steps so that the process is quick and straightforward.
Who needs to know about this
Developers, Eoin
Done when
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: