Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Re-add Sidekiq to application #1355

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 10, 2025
Merged

Re-add Sidekiq to application #1355

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 10, 2025

Conversation

csutter
Copy link
Contributor

@csutter csutter commented Feb 4, 2025

This was removed due to a misunderstanding around this app not using Sidekiq (we removed some old code in advance of rebuilding it, and the app thus temporarily did not use Sidekiq).

Copy link
Contributor

@leenagupte leenagupte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does a redis setup need to be added to the rspec workflow config? See .github/workflows/rspec.yml in the PR that removed sidekiq.

We've also talked in another form about a slight tweak to the wording of one of the comments.

Otherwise it looks good.

@csutter
Copy link
Contributor Author

csutter commented Feb 6, 2025

Does a redis setup need to be added to the rspec workflow config? See .github/workflows/rspec.yml in the PR that removed sidekiq.

I don't think so – we should be using Sidekiq's testing facilities rather than relying on a real Redis in test.

If it turns out we do need it, it should be simple enough to add in when we actually do 🤞

@csutter
Copy link
Contributor Author

csutter commented Feb 6, 2025

Also adding a note that alphagov/govuk-helm-charts#2969 should be merged before this PR 💡

@csutter csutter merged commit 05059d7 into main Feb 10, 2025
10 checks passed
@csutter csutter deleted the sidekiq branch February 10, 2025 15:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants